Nigeria, as global aid funding collapses

Nigeria’s latest ranking as the world’s top hunger hotspot for 2026 should shake the nation out of policy fatigue and rhetorical comfort. According to Action Against Hunger’s 2026 Global Hunger Hotspots report, nearly 32 million Nigerians are facing acute food insecurity, placing the country above Sudan and the Democratic Republic of Congo on a list of the world’s most critical hunger crises.

This is not just a humanitarian headline but also a national indictment. Because hunger at this scale is not simply a shortage of food; it is the collapse of systems that make food available, affordable, and accessible. It is also a warning that Nigeria’s overdependence on external humanitarian support has become a dangerous weakness, especially now that global aid is shrinking fast.

“And when food aid disappears in a fragile region, hunger does not remain a private suffering; it becomes a security issue. People are forced into desperate choices, such as migration, crime, child labour, early marriage, recruitment by extremist groups, or risky survival economies.”

The era of ‘someone will come and help’ is ending. Nigeria must urgently build a new model. One that treats food security as economic security and survival as a domestic responsibility.

Action Against Hunger’s report lays out what it calls an ‘unprecedented convergence of crises’ (armed conflict, climate shocks, economic pressures, and now damaging cuts to humanitarian funding). The effects are already showing in brutal clarity.

In January 2026, Reuters reported that the United Nations expects about 35 million Nigerians to be at risk of hunger in 2026, including three million children facing severe malnutrition, as global aid funding collapses.

The same report highlighted how UN support is being scaled down dramatically, with Nigeria’s 2026 humanitarian plan targeting fewer people, not because needs have dropped, but because money has. The World Food Programme has also issued stark warnings that funding gaps could cut off large numbers of people from emergency food and nutrition support, especially in conflict-hit areas of the northeast.

And when food aid disappears in a fragile region, hunger does not remain a private suffering; it becomes a security issue. People are forced into desperate choices, such as migration, crime, child labour, early marriage, recruitment by extremist groups, or risky survival economies.

This is why the hunger emergency is not only about feeding people today. It is about preventing Nigeria from becoming a permanent theatre of crisis.

Nigeria is not poor in land, labour, or agricultural tradition. The country has vast arable land and a large farming population. Yet tens of millions remain food insecure. That contradiction tells the truth that the problem is not the absence of food potential; it is the presence of systemic failure.

Conflict remains a major driver, as violence and displacement, especially in Borno, Adamawa, and Yobe, continue to disrupt farming cycles and markets.

Climate extremes also worsen vulnerabilities, while inflation squeezes household purchasing power and raises the cost of inputs such as fertiliser, fuel, transport, and improved seeds.

Even when food exists, it can be priced out of reach. Hunger is often a poverty problem wearing a food mask.

International reports have repeatedly warned that Nigeria is among the countries with the largest numbers of people facing high acute food insecurity. For example, a World Bank Food Security Update in 2025 cited over 30 million people facing high levels of acute food insecurity in Nigeria, already an alarming baseline before 2026’s spike.

So, the hunger figures are not sudden; they are the logical outcome of years of weak production systems, fragile rural infrastructure, insecurity, and a policy culture that reacts to food crises instead of preventing them.

Nigeria’s humanitarian crisis is now colliding with a second crisis, the shrinking of global generosity. Aid budgets are tightening across many donor nations, driven by domestic politics, economic pressures, and shifting priorities. Analysts have described this as a ‘seismic shift’ in humanitarian financing, with US commitments falling sharply in 2025 compared with 2024.

This matters because Nigeria’s emergency response has increasingly leaned on external agencies to feed displaced communities, treat malnourished children, and stabilise fragile zones. But even the UN’s humanitarian leadership in Nigeria has admitted that the foreign-led aid model is not sustainable, especially as funding collapses.

The truth is uncomfortable, as Nigeria is too large, too strategic, and too populated to run its food survival on donors’ moods.

If the funding dries up, as current signals suggest it will, then Nigeria must be ready with domestic buffers.

Escaping aid dependence does not mean rejecting humanitarian support when lives are at stake. It means refusing to build a national survival strategy around emergency handouts.

Nigeria needs a new food security doctrine built on five priorities.

Firstly, secure farmlands and restore rural confidence, as no farming policy can succeed when farmers fear kidnapping, banditry, or insurgent attacks. The government must treat rural security as a food policy through intelligence-led policing, better coordination, and community-based protection models.

Secondly, scale irrigation and dry-season farming, as rain-fed agriculture leaves Nigeria vulnerable to climate shocks. Expanding irrigation infrastructure and supporting dry-season farming can stabilise supply, reduce seasonal hunger, and create year-round rural jobs.

Thirdly, fix storage, transport, and market access, as the nation loses enormous value post-harvest due to poor storage and logistics. Investing in silos, cold chains, rural roads, and aggregation centres would reduce losses, stabilise prices, and raise farmer income.

Fourthly, make nutrition a core development goal, as Action Against Hunger warns that millions of children across hunger hotspots suffer acute malnutrition, and pregnant and breastfeeding women are also affected. Nigeria must mainstream nutrition into primary healthcare, especially for the first 1,000 days of life, because malnutrition is not just hunger but also long-term damage to human capital.

Lastly, create a national food reserve and shock-response financing, as we need stronger strategic grain reserves, transparent management, and predictable financing for emergency response. If the world is cutting aid, Nigeria must build its own rapid-response capability through budget prioritisation and disaster risk financing.

Nigeria’s hunger hotspot ranking is a global embarrassment, but it can also become a turning point. The country can either continue as a permanent emergency zone, waiting for foreign agencies to fill gaps, or build the systems that make hunger politically unacceptable and economically impossible.

Aid will always be needed in acute emergencies, but dependence is a policy failure.

Nigeria must stop treating hunger like an event. It is a system problem, and the only sustainable solution is to build a food economy that works securely, efficiently, and inclusively so that no funding cut abroad can decide whether Nigerian children eat or starve.

comment is free

Send 800word comments to [email protected]

Join BusinessDay whatsapp Channel, to stay up to date