FJSC, not NJC, handled qualification process for Federal High Court judgeships

By : Ameh Ochojila

Date: 2 January 2026 9:22am WAT

Share :

National Judicial Council

National Judicial Council

The National Judicial Council (NJC) has clarified that it has not taken final action on the 62 legal practitioners in the country who applied for appointment as judges of the Federal High Court of Nigeria.

The NJC also clarified that all the qualification processes referred to in the earlier media report on judicial officers’ appointment took place entirely at the level of the Federal Judicial Service Commission (FJSC). Specifically, the Council said reports that 34 of the lawyers failed an integrity test and were dropped from consideration for appointment were inaccurate and unauthorised by the NJC. In a statement on Thursday, signed by the NJC Secretary, Malam Ahmed Gambo Saleh, Esq., the Council said the reports, which have been circulating on both social and conventional media, did not reflect what actually transpired in the judicial appointment process.

According to the NJC, all the processes referred to in the report took place entirely at the level of the Federal Judicial Service Commission (FJSC), stressing that no decision or action has so far been taken by the Council in respect of the candidates concerned. The Council explained that while a few candidates were discontinued at the FJSC stage due to adverse findings arising from petitions submitted to the Commission, others did not progress further because they failed to attain the required qualifying score to move to the interview stage before the NJC. It also clarified that there is no stand-alone or newly introduced “integrity test” that automatically disqualified candidates in bulk, as suggested by the reports.

The statement said: “Rather, the judicial appointment process remains structured, merit-based and multi-layered, involving written examinations, performance benchmarks, background checks, consideration of petitions where applicable, and interviews conducted in line with established guidelines.” The NJC expressed concern that the publication of inaccurate and speculative information could mislead the public and unfairly damage the reputation of candidates who participated in the process in good faith.

As a result, the Council disclosed that it has commenced internal investigations to identify the source of the unauthorised press statement, adding that it will take appropriate steps to safeguard the integrity and credibility of its procedures. The NJC reaffirmed its commitment to transparency, fairness, due process and the highest standards of judicial integrity, while pleading with media practitioners to always seek clarification through authorised channels before publishing reports on sensitive institutional matters.

Tags: