Owo Church Attack: DSS Witness Narrates How Forensic Analysis Implicated Suspected Attackers

An officer of the Department of State Services has told Justice Emeka Nwite of the Federal High Court, Abuja, how cell phone analysis of the four men being prosecuted for allegedly carrying out the June 5, 2022, attack on St. Francis Catholic Church, Owo, Ondo State, placed them at the crime scene.

The officer, with code name S.S.J,  told the court that phone calls by the defendants about the time of the attack, put them in the vicinity of St. Francis Catholic Church, Owo.

He disclosed that the DSS had sufficient technical evidence to show that the first to fourth defendants were around the church premises during the attack.

The officer explained that the technical evidence showed that their phones and conversations were around the telecommunications cell site location around the attack.

Aside from the phone records’ analysis conducted by the DSS, according to the officer, the defendants voluntarily made confessional statements linking them to the attack.

READ ALSO: How Terror Attack On Owo Catholic Church Was Planned, Executed — DSS Witness

The witness said the statement-taking session was witnessed by the Director of the Legal Aid Council, when the defendants said they could not afford to have either their lawyers or family members around to witness the session.

He identified the five defendants, giving details of how he obtained the confessional statements from the first to fourth defendants, which he said they offered voluntarily.

An objection raised by the defence lawyer, Abdullahi Mohammad, to the admissibility of the defendants’ statements was overruled by the trial judge, Justice Emeka Nwite.

In a ruling, Justice Nwite also rejected Mohammad’s request that the court order the conduct of a trial-within-trial to resolve all the doubts about whether or not the defendants made the statements.

Justice Nwite upheld the submission of the prosecuting lawyer, Ayodeji Adedipe (SAN), that a trial-within-trial could only be ordered where the issue is about the voluntariness of the statement and not where a defendant denies making the statement, as it is in the case.

After the 10th prosecution witness gave evidence about how he obtained the confessional statements from the first to fourth defendants, Adedipe applied to tender them in evidence.

Muhammad objected to the admissibility of the statements and urged the court to order a trial-within-trial on the grounds that the said statements were not made by his clients.

Testifying earlier under cross-examination by Muhammad, the ninth prosecution witness, S.S.I, insisted that the defendants were involved in the attack and gave further details of what the investigation conducted on the case by the DSS revealed.

SSI, who told the court on Tuesday that he led the investigation team, restated that the defendants were arrested in August 2022, in both Kogi and Ondo States, while they were interviewed in Abuja.

He confirmed that all defendants are members of ISWAP, who belong to a cell operating as Al Shabab.

He stated that there is also a Mahmuda group of ISWAP in the area.

The witness told the court that after the attack, the fourth defendant returned the weapons used for the attack to Odoba and also returned the car to where he rented it from.

SSI confirmed that the case was thoroughly investigated and that evidence that indicted the defendants were duly obtained.

The witness confirmed that the defendants used two vehicles during the attack, adding that while they drove in a rented vehicle to the church, they snatched another vehicle from a worshipper, who was returning from church service, which they used as a getaway vehicle.

He further confirmed that the defendants had a meeting at Government Secondary School, Ogaminana, where one Odoba gave the instruction to the 2nd Defendant for the attack.

The meeting, the witness said, preceded two other meetings they held on the third and fourth of June, 2022, before the attack.

SSI confirmed that the defendants used both explosives and several rounds of ammunition during the attack.

He insisted that no other persons outside the defendants were arrested by the DSS in respect of this case.

Further hearing in the case has been adjourned to  Thursday, February 19.