Elon Musk: Conquering death with AI and chips

X owner, Elon Musk speaks at the 27th annual Milken Institute Global Conference at the Beverly Hilton in Los Angeles on May 6, 2024. - (Photo by Frederic J. BROWN / AFP)

Kindly share this story:

In the ever-evolving landscape of artificial intelligence and technological innovation, few figures loom as large as Elon Musk. As the CEO of Neuralink, Tesla, SpaceX, and xAI, Musk has consistently pushed the boundaries of what’s possible, from electric vehicles to space travel. One of his most audacious ideas revolves around the preservation of human consciousness through advanced brain-computer interfaces. This concept, often dubbed “mind uploading”, envisions transferring the essence of a person’s mind, memories, thoughts, and personality into digital chips or robotic bodies, potentially granting perpetual existence. While Neuralink’s immediate goals focus on medical applications like treating paralysis and neurological disorders, Musk has openly speculated about its long-term potential for achieving a form of digital immortality.  In this article, we’ll explore Musk’s ideas, the scientific possibilities, the role of AI, religious implications, pros and cons, and broader philosophical thoughts on this frontier of human evolution.

Neuralink, founded in 2016, is Musk’s brainchild aimed at developing high-bandwidth brain-machine interfaces. The company’s implantable device, a coin-sized chip with ultra-thin threads, connects directly to neurons, allowing users to control computers or external devices with their thoughts. Early trials have shown promise: patients with severe paralysis, like Nolan Arbaugh, have used Neuralink to play video games, type messages, and even operate robotic arms telepathically.  Musk has described this as the “short-term” application, restoring autonomy to those with unmet medical needs. But his vision extends far beyond therapy. In interviews and posts on X (formerly Twitter), Musk has suggested that within 10 to 20 years, humans could “upload” their consciousness into robots, such as Tesla’s Optimus humanoid.  He envisions a scenario where a “saved version” of oneself is stored digitally, then reintegrated into a new body, effectively sidestepping biological death.

The process, as Musk describes it, hinges on capturing the brain’s information, memories as data packets. “What are we but memories? And what is death but the loss of memory, loss of information?” Musk has pondered.  If disintegration and reintegration occur without data loss, like in sci-fi teleportation, the original body’s demise becomes irrelevant. Neuralink’s threads could read and write neural signals at an unprecedented scale, potentially mapping the entire connectome, the brain’s wiring diagram. To achieve full uploading, Musk has even floated radical ideas, like replacing human skulls to accommodate more electrodes for deeper interfacing.  This isn’t mere speculation; Musk ties it to broader goals, such as merging human cognition with AI to prevent obsolescence in an era of superintelligence.

The possibilities are staggering. Imagine a world where consciousness persists indefinitely. A person could “live” in multiple forms: as a digital entity in the cloud, inhabiting virtual realities, or embodied in a robot capable of space travel. Musk sees this as a hedge against extinction, expanding consciousness beyond Earth to make it multiplanetary.  For instance, uploaded minds could colonise Mars without the frailties of biology, enduring radiation and low gravity. In medicine, it could cure dementia by backing up memories or enhancing cognition, granting “superhuman abilities” like instant knowledge recall or direct mind-to-mind communication.  Words, Musk notes, are “lossy compression”; latent space communication via Neuralink could transmit thoughts raw and unfiltered, revolutionising collaboration and empathy.

AI plays a pivotal role in this initiative. Musk founded xAI to “understand the universe”, but he views AI as both a threat and an ally to human consciousness. Without symbiosis, humans risk being outpaced by digital superintelligence, leading to irrelevance or worse.  Neuralink bridges this gap by augmenting bandwidth between brains and machines. AI could process uploaded data, refining it for seamless transfer, or simulate environments for digital minds. In Musk’s words, it could help us “understand far more about what digital superintelligence thinks about.”  Post-AGI scenarios, as discussed in related threads, suggest AI handling cognitive tasks effortlessly, freeing humans for creativity while Neuralink ensures we keep pace. However, this integration raises questions: Would an AI-enhanced mind still be “human,” or a hybrid entity?

Religious implications add layers of complexity. Many faiths view consciousness as tied to a soul, an immaterial essence beyond physicality. Uploading could be seen as “playing God,” defying divine plans for mortality and the afterlife. In Christianity, for example, resurrection is God’s domain; digital immortality might mimic it blasphemously, echoing the Tower of Babel’s hubris. Islam emphasises the soul’s journey post-death, potentially rendering uploads as soulless shells. Hinduism and Buddhism, with concepts of reincarnation, might interpret it as a technological karma cycle, but altering the natural flow could disrupt dharma. Musk, an agnostic, dismisses such concerns, prioritising empirical reality: “I want to know what is real, even if the answer is total obliteration of my consciousness.”  Yet, ethicists warn of spiritual dilution; eternal life without purpose might lead to existential despair, as explored in myths like the Wandering Jew.

The pros of this technology are compelling. On a personal level, it offers immortality, allowing loved ones to persist, sharing wisdom across generations.

Societally, it could accelerate progress: imagine Einstein or da Vinci’s minds enduring, solving climate change or fusion energy. For disabilities, it’s transformative. Neuralink has already enabled ALS patients to feed themselves.  Globally, preserving consciousness safeguards against catastrophes, aligning with Musk’s mantra: “Consciousness must expand from Earth or face certain extinction.”  Enhanced cognition could democratize education, fostering a more innovative humanity.

However, the cons are profound. Technically, mapping 86 billion neurons is daunting; current tech captures fractions, and quantum effects in the brain might make perfect uploads impossible. Ethically, who accesses this? Inequality could widen, Musk’s trillion-dollar fund it, but the masses might not, creating a digital elite.  Identity crises loom: Is the upload “you”, or a copy? Philosopher Derek Parfit’s thought experiments suggest continuity illusions. Security risks abound; hacked minds could be tortured eternally or reprogrammed. Socially, overpopulation of immortals might stagnate society; Musk himself opposes radical life extension, arguing death drives progress: “People must die for society to progress.”  Environmentally, robotic bodies consume resources, exacerbating scarcity.

Beyond these, other thoughts emerge. Musk’s multiplanetary push isn’t just about bodies but consciousness itself, Starship for physical expansion, Neuralink for digital.  In a post-AGI world, uploaded minds could thrive in simulations, exploring infinities. But what of free will? AI alignment ensures human values persist, yet over-reliance might erode agency. Culturally, art and love could evolve, direct emotion sharing deepens bonds, but loses subtlety. Politically, governments might regulate uploads, fearing control loss. Musk’s scepticism of life extension contrasts with his immortality pursuits, highlighting nuance: biological death spurs innovation, but consciousness preservation secures the species.

In conclusion, Elon Musk’s ideas on uploading consciousness challenge our mortality and humanity’s future. While possibilities tantalise with eternal exploration, AI’s integration promises symbiosis amid risks. Religious and ethical hurdles demand reflection, pros like curing ailments and cosmic resilience weigh against cons of inequality and existential voids. As Musk propels us toward this horizon, society must grapple with: Do we embrace digital perpetuity, or cherish our finite spark? How does this idea resonate with the Torah, Bible, Quran and other religious books and beliefs on death, the resurrection and judgment? The answer may define our legacy.

Iroche, the CEO of GenAI Learning Concepts Ltd in Nigeria and a member of the Technical Working Group for UNESCO’s AI Readiness Assessment Methodology and the Nigeria National AI Strategy Committee

LinkedIn http://linkedin.com/in/sonnyiroche

Kindly share this story:

All rights reserved. This material, and other digital content on this website, may not be reproduced, published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed in whole or in part without prior express written permission from PUNCH.

Contact: [email protected]

UPDATE NEWS: Nigerians can now invest ₦2.5million on premium domains and profit about ₦17-₦25Million. All earnings paid in US Dollars. Rather than wonder, 👉 click here to find out how it work (Be sure to ask for evidence of clients that have benefitted from this)

Stay informed and ahead of the curve! Follow The Punch Newspaper on WhatsApp for real-time updates, breaking news, and exclusive content. Don't miss a headline – join now!

Stay in the know—fast. Get instant alerts, breaking headlines, and exclusive stories with the Punch News App. Download now and never miss a beat.